RealWorld Training and Consulting

Practical Support for the Changing World at Work 
Linda F. Willing
P.O. Box 148
Grand Lake, CO
80447
970-627-3732
Home | About Us | Services | Clients | Resources | Newsletter| Archives | Contact

Consider This... August/September 2003 Issue Number 50

Is a monthly electronic newsletter which links current events and issues to the daily challenges faced by fire and emergency services managers. Current topics in the areas of leadership development, workplace diversity, change management, and conflict resolution will be discussed.

We hope that you find the information here useful and provocative.
Let us know what you think! If you'd like to subscribe to the newsletter, please enter your email address in the box below.

Sign up for our free newsletter,
Consider This...

enter your email address
Upcoming Events

The following networking opportunities will be available at the Fire-Rescue International Conference in Dallas later this month:
 
Women Chief Officers Luncheon
Native American Chief Officers Breakfast
Hispanic Chief Officers Luncheon
Black Chief Officers Luncheon
 
Advance purchase of tickets is required for these events.  For more information, and specific times, go to www.iafc.org and click on Conferences.

Fire-Rescue International , August 22-25, 2003, Dallas, Texas. Linda Willing will be presenting a workshop entitled "Stop "Putting Out Fires": A Prevention Approach to Workplace Conflict Management."

IAFF Human Relations Conference January 25-28, 2004, Santa Monica, CA. Linda Willing will be presenting a workshop at this conference. For more information, go to www.iaff.org.

Leadership Training Seminar , March 25-28, 2004, Miami, Florida. Go to www.wfsi.org for more information.  

In the News

Regulating Off Duty Conduct  

How much control can fire departments have over the off duty behavior of their members? Two recent cases highlight the problems associated with regulating off duty conduct.  

The first case involved two off duty firefighters and an off duty police officer who created and rode on a float in a neighborhood parade in New York City. The safety officers, all white, blatantly portrayed blacks in a mocking and stereotypical way: eating watermelon and chanting civil rights slogans while dressed in blackface and Afro wigs made from mops. The display included a joking pantomime of the dragging death of one member, a reference to the Jasper, Texas incident where three white men killed a black man by dragging him behind their truck.  

The second incident involved three Wichita firefighters who appeared on the Jay Leno show and participated in a stunt where one man set his chest hair on fire. The other two men then shot fire extinguishers at him. At least one man identified himself as a firefighter while on the show.  

In the case of the racist float, all three men were fired from their jobs, and they subsequently sued to be reinstated saying that the firings were a violation of their First Amendment right to freedom of expression. They recently won their case. The Wichita case is pending departmental action. Fire Chief Larry Garcia has called it, "idiotic, at the very best."  

The New York City verdict ( Locurto v. Giuliani ) has caused considerable reaction. Although New York City has a policy that employees may be terminated if their continued employment will cause disruption to the municipality in its efforts to carry out functions for which those employees were hired, Judge Sprizzo ruled that the city in this case overstepped its bounds. He ruled that the city, in firing the plaintiffs, did not act out of concern about public disruption resulting from the float, but rather in an effort to silence a racist message. This, he said, was a violation of the First Amendment.  

There is no question that employers can control personal expression while on duty (see Newsletter, July-August, 2003). It is much harder to control off duty behavior, and perhaps in most ways, this is a good thing. We value our personal freedoms in this country, and the Constitution was written to preserve them. But firefighters and police officers are in a unique position of trust within their communities. People let them into their homes, no questions asked, and entrust them with their own safety and the well being of their family members. How will African-American citizens in New York City feel when one of the men who created that float comes to their front door? Will there be the same level of trust that is usually assumed from safety officers? How will parents in Wichita feel when one of the men who appeared on Jay Leno comes to their child's school to teach fire safety?  

Public safety is about trust and credibility. Egregious off duty behavior may not be illegal, but it can seriously damage the trust and credibility that all firefighters and police officers need to be effective in their jobs. One reason public safety officers wear uniforms is to create faith among the service community that all members are equally qualified and capable of providing service. When a few members behave badly, it brings everyone down in the eyes of those they serve. As Chief Garcia said, "They brought shame to themselves, and we're included in that."  

Sources: The New York Racist Float Case by Sherry Colb on www.findlaw.com
             The Wichita Eagle, July 26, 2003
 

News Brief


Pennsylvania Governor Ed Rendell has signed an executive order barring state agencies from discriminating against employees based on their gender identity, adding transgendered people to the list of those whose rights are protected. The order affects approximately 87,000 employees in the state.  

Source: Associated Press, July 29, 2003  

 

Sexual Harassment Update

Contractors and Local Ordinances  

A challenge to a law that requires contractors to abide by local guidelines on domestic partnerships has recently been decided in favor of the City and County of San Francisco in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals.  

In 1997, S. D. Myers Inc., an Ohio company, submitted the lowest bid to service transformers owned by the City of San Francisco, but located outside the city boundaries in Northern California. To receive the bid, the city required that Myers comply with a city ordinance which guarantees rights for those in registered domestic partnerships. This ordinance is a statement by the City of San Francisco that it will "not do business with entities that discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation." Myers objected to abiding by the ordinance on religious and moral principles, and as a result, their bid was rejected. The company subsequently sued, challenging the validity of the ordinance, and thus the requirement that they be bound by it.  

The appeal was based on technicalities relating to whether the city ordinance contradicted other laws applicable in California. Myers lost its first lawsuit when the court upheld the ordinance as consistent with state and federal law, and the U.S. Constitution. Myers then asked that the ordinance be invalidated because it was inconsistent with California Family Code. The court also rejected this challenge.  

This case demonstrates that jurisdictions have the power to make law that applies not only to those who work directly within the city or county, but also to anyone who chooses to contract with that entity. Myers' original grievance related to moral offense was rejected, as was its attempts to undermine the law with technical challenges. Local and state ordinances go beyond those who serve directly within the jurisdiction. This case demonstrates that such laws can affect those who contract with those entities as well.  

Source: S.D. Myers Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco. 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals, #02-16480

© Linda F. Willing, 2003

Home | About Us | Services | Clients | Resources | Newsletter| Archives | Contact